Both women have a long history of supporting University funding. Schroer and Brater both opposed last year's Hood Amendment, which would have held back more than $8.3 million in allocation to the University because some lawmakers were concerned that the University's out-of-state enrollment surpassed 30 percent. Both lawmakers led the fight to restore funding. Students can count on both representatives to consistently represent their interests in Lansing.
The two candidates fought against Gov. John Engler's cuts to the state's adult education programs. They support affirmative action and voted against state amendments to weaken it. Both advocate progressive social policy: Brater is a strong supporter of rigorous environmental protection and Schroer serves on several House committees and judiciary sub-committees - including those for education, civil rights and affirmative action.
Brater's and Schroer's experience is an important asset to push legislation through the Legislature. While working in a Republican-controlled House, they built bipartisan coalitions, allowing them to serve the best interest of their districts.
Brater's opponent, Chris Schmitt, shows promise, but his inexperience hinders his potential as a legislator. He graduated from the University last August and, due to his lack of leadership experience, should consider running for a lower-level office - perhaps in the city or school board - to build up a record. Schmitt declared his Republican Party preference in February - and even now he does not seem to adhere to many of the party's traditional beliefs. For example, he supports abortion rights and would not vote to ban same-sex marriage. While his independent streak could be an asset, Schmitt seems confused about his party identification.
Schroer's opponent, David Felbeck, is a staunch advocate of government downsizing and noninterference in private matters. He opposes funding organizations like Planned Parenthood and advocates dissociation between government and the private sector. Felbeck's opposition to most government services would not bode well for the University.
Felbeck's most disturbing position is his stance against affirmative action. He told The Michigan Daily that affirmative action is an "abysmal failure," and that it has led to the enrollment of people in the University who "should never have (been admitted) in the first place." His beliefs seriously undercut the University's commitment to diversity - and is poor social policy.
The incumbent candidates provide experience, pragmatism and perseverance. They are ardent supporters of the University and will continue to serve it well in the future. Moreover, both are accessible and willing to talk with constituents.
Vote Mary Schroer and Liz Brater for state representatives in Districts 52 and 53.