Tobacco companies may cut back on ads

The Associated Press

Leaders of two big cigarette companies are ready to make a deal.

Abandoning their all-out defense of cigarettes, the nation's two biggest tobacco companies now seem willing to cut their legal losses for up to $300 billion and retire Joe Camel and the Marlboro Man if the government backs off its threat to regulate nicotine.

RJR Nabisco and Philip Morris executives are in early talks with the attorneys general of eight states in hopes of winning blanket protection from lawsuits over smoking-related health problems, it was disclosed yesterday.

In return, the cigarette companies would pay hundreds of billions of dollars and agree to cut back on ads, especially ones like Joe Camel that appeal to children and those that depict people, such as the Marlboro Man.

The cigarette companies' willingness to even consider such concessions marks a startling turnaround. For decades, the tobacco industry has fought a no-retreat battle on all fronts.

In the past few years, however, the industry has been barraged with lawsuits filed by 22 states and countless individuals, and the litigation is hurting stock prices and taking management attention away from the business of selling cigarettes.

"I think the tobacco industry is in big trouble and they know it, so they are finally beginning to come to the table," Minnesota Attorney General Hubert Humphrey III said. "I think their proposals still fall short of what we'd be interested in."

A sticking point is whether the Food and Drug Administration would get the right to regulate the nicotine levels in cigarettes to make them less addictive.

The tobacco companies adamantly oppose such regulation for fear that once the FDA gets the power to regulate tobacco, it will try to ban it.

Reports of negotiations between the tobacco companies, attorneys general and anti-tobacco lawyers aimed at settling health-related lawsuits began a few months ago. Bloomberg News reported in February that such talks were taking place and the White House was monitoring them.

But news that the top executives of RJR Nabisco and Philip Morris were personally attending such talks, reported yesterday by The Wall Street Journal, sparked a 10 percent rally in cigarette company stocks and boosted investor hopes of a settlement, which would lift a cloud hanging over the tobacco companies.

Industry analysts have said that tobacco companies, which had revenue of about $45 billion last year, could finance a big settlement simply by raising cigarette prices.

"A resolution of this issue is important to our shareholders, our customers and our country," RJR Nabisco Chair Steven Goldstone told a stockholder meeting yesterday in Winston-Salem, N.C. "But it has to be fair and it has to be reasonable."

The amount of a settlement is also among the sticking points.

"The industry is in the low 2's and the plaintiffs are in the upper 3's. There is no consensus on the money," said a source close to the negotiations, who spoke on condition of anonymity.

Also under discussion is the establishment of a fund from which smokers could seek payments. They would be banned from suing the cigarette companies.

Protection from lawsuits would require an act of Congress, and that's another one of the unresolved issues that could still sink the talks.

"It's extraordinarily unlikely that any agreement could escape contentious congressional hearings," the source said.

Democratic Sen. Dick Durbin of Illinois, a longtime tobacco opponent, said he is skeptical of the industry's proposals and will review them carefully if they land on Capitol Hill.

"The great wall of tobacco is coming down," Durbin said. "Tobacco companies are in a hurry to get out of court, off the front pages of newspapers and back to the business of making billions of dollars in profit."

04-17-97

HOME| NEWS| EDITORIAL| ARTS| SPORTS| CLASSIFIED| ARCHIVES|


©1997 The Michigan Daily
Letters to the editor
should be sent to:
daily.letters@umich.edu
Comments about this site
should be sent to:
online.daily@umich.edu