Letters to the Editor

Playboy objectifies women

To the Daily:
This is in response to Stephanie Stowe's letter ("Playboy is an 'art form,'" 3/24/97). I think it's time for people to wake up and see all the negative effects pornography has on women. It's not a matter of "having the choice to pose or not" as Stow e so simply suggested. Instead, people need to look at the broader scope and realize that these images we see, whether it's in Playboy or Hustler, contribute to women being viewed as nothing more than erotic subordinates. Just because Playboy actual ly "shows a woman's face" unlike the other garbage that focuses on body parts doesn't make it any better. The message to anyone who opens it is clear: "Women are nothing more than sex objects for men to masturbate over."

Regardless of whether or not Playboy is paying tribute to the "Women of the Big Ten" or the "Lawyers Association," once women strip to pose, they inevitably reinforce the notion that no matter how arduously they've worked to achieve success using th eir intellect, they are actually nothing more than a piece of meat. If such women believe they are being taken seriously simply because their bodies are plastered across the pages of Playboy as opposed to Hustler, I strongly urge them to think again .

Although many people are under the misguided impression that "simply posing nude for a magazine doesn't hurt anyone," they need to realize that violence against women is directly linked to their objectification through pornography. Please do not con fuse material like Playboy with "art" - this is just another way of arguing for the subordination of women. Playboy, when stripped to its core, is nothing more than a magazine made for the pleasure of men and the devaluation of women. I encourage al l those who value such filth for the pleasure it arouses to ask themselves this question: "Is all this pleasure worth the dehumanization, subordination, and ultimate harm women experience?" - I hope you answer with a unanimous, roaring "no!"

Lara Hamza
LSA junior

'U' must address need for Latino/a cultural center

To the Daily:
Recently, a diverse group of Latino/a students met to discuss our struggle for equality at the University. One of the conclusions which emerged from this discussion was the degree to which we are in need of a Latino/a Cultural Center. While this ide a has been circulating in our community for many years, the University administration has consistently discouraged any efforts to pursue it.

As recent enrollment and application figures for Latino/a students demonstrate, the University has a problem recruiting Latino/a students as well as faculty. One of the factors influencing this is the lack of a space our community can call our own a t the University. Our community and organizations are in a constant struggle for space to hold events and meetings. The lack of a place where we can belong as Latinos/as is detrimental to the vitality of our community and contributes to the Universi ty's problems in retaining Latino/a students.

A Latino/a Cultural Center would contribute greatly to the University's efforts to recruit and retain Latino/a students, faculty and staff as well as making an invaluable contribution to the diverse atmosphere the University values so highly. As suc h, the University should pursue the creation of a Latino/a Cultural Center with as much vigor as many Latino/a students intend to in the coming months.

Nora Salas
RC senior

Protest story ignored other side of porn

To the Daily:
We are writing to express our deep concern about the Daily's March 19 article, "Playboy takes off on campus amid protest." The Daily topped its objective treatment of the event with the photo caption "Protest of the Month." Instead of presenting a f air and unbiased view of pornography as a serious issue, the Daily opted to trivialize it with a "humorous" allusion to Playboy's "Playmate of the Month." Cute.

The article gives very comprehensive coverage of Playboy employees' understanding of the protest -quite enlightened - and reduces the purpose of the student protest to a few quotes. In the interest of actually representing the students' perspective we would like to correct the Daily reporter's incompetence and ignorance by offering the side of the story ignored in Wednesday's article:

Student posing: I have been waiting to pose since I was a little kid.

Student protester: I have been waiting to be regarded as a person not a piece of flesh since I was a little kid.

Playboy hair and makeup stylist: The protesters are misguided. I do not think many of those girls have ever looked through a Playboy.

Student protester: The pornographers misguide the public and perpetuate the subordination of women because it's profitable. These "girls" have seen Playboy and we've seen/lived its consequences.

Playboy photographer: They should protest something more national.

Student protester: Pornography is national. Playboy has the highest circulation of any magazine in this country. More people pick up the misogyny of Playboy than pick up a Newsweek.

Daily: Magazine officials found many protesters hoping to discourage women from showing their stuff.

Student protester: Every day, women at this university show their real stuff - their intellect, creativity and social activism - without putting their bodies on display.

We find the Daily's trivialization and misrepresentation of the protest extremely irresponsible and offensive, and hope the Daily will refrain from such shoddy journalism in the future.

Melanie Nelson
LSA junior, Co-chair, Women's Issues Commission

LSA-SG coverage insufficient

To the Daily:
I was disappointed in the Daily's coverage of the LSA - Student Government election. As students only source of information on student elections, the Daily has a responsibility to have full and comprehensive coverage of the elections.

Yet, the Daily only mentioned the outcome of the presidential and vice presidential races. The outcome of the representative races and the result of the vote to change LSA-SG constitution were never covered. I would hope the Daily would do a more th orough job of reporting student government election results in the future.

Zachary Shirkey
LSA junior

MSA should maintain ties to students after elections

To the Daily:
This week all the election posters, banners and diag boards will come down, but the communication must continue. This link between the Michigan Student Assembly and the student body must be yearlong.

However, this is a two-way street. Students should use MSA's homepage (http://www.umich.edu/~msa) to post messages, complete surveys and e-mail their representatives.

Assembly members must maintain "election type" contact with those they represent. This communication will increase the power and accuracy of the student voice.

Ryan Friedrichs
RC sophomore, MSA Communications chair

03-27-97

HOME| NEWS| EDITORIAL| ARTS| SPORTS| CLASSIFIED| ARCHIVES|


©1997 The Michigan Daily
Letters to the editor
should be sent to:
daily.letters@umich.edu
Comments about this site
should be sent to:
online.daily@umich.edu