Student groups traditionally encounter numerous problems in their quest for funds. First, most student groups are self-supported and must apply for funding for their events. This search for funds leads many to MSA, which has limited resources as compared with its demand. With more than 100 applications per semester and a mere $70,000 budget, BPC is strapped for cash; it is unable to provide groups with nearly the amount requested. BPC is in a situation that demands strict rules to limit the amount of money they can allocate. Although there is no maximum request, BPC is unable to allocate more than a few thousand dollars - even for groups that need more.
The myriad groups eligible for funding under BPC's umbrella continues to grow yearly - and many organizations come to BPC because they have nowhere else to turn. For example, the University does not fund women's lacrosse, men's crew, men's and women's rugby, and many other club sports. Instead, BPC must fund these groups, as student government is the only source of funding. When the allocations come up short, club members must pay exorbitant fees.
Also, BPC funds projects that should be funded by the University. For example, BPC annually funds the Michigan Women's Handbook that all women in residence halls receive. This handbook discusses pertinent issues for women at the University, and the University endows many similar publications, such as the Campus Safety handbook.
Last year, President Lee Bollinger stated that he wished students would play a more active role in campus and world affairs. An excellent step for his administration to encourage student activism would be to provide additional funds for BPC. Under the current system, BPC receives all funds from the student government fee each student pays per semester. By contributing funds to BPC, the University would help alleviate much of the strain placed on student groups and BPC. In addition, added funds could break down many of the barriers imposed by BPC regulations. For instance, in the past, BPC hesitated to fund events that solely benefited the group members, such as a retreat. This was due, in part, to the lack of funds.
Student groups should be supported by the University. MSA must retain decision-making autonomy, but a boost from the University's coffers would help student groups develop their ideas into plans of action. This is a crucial opportunity for the University to play a vital role in student affairs.