Students discuss 'U' activism

Seven activist groups and nearly 30 students gathered last night to discuss apathy and strategies for improving activists' success.

The meeting, organized by the Queer Unity Project, allowed members from several groups to air their concerns about growing apathy among University students.

One of the topics discussed was why students do not get involved in activist groups. "I think people join groups that will make their lives better. They look to make an immediate effect on their own life," said QUP member James Gies, a University alumnus.

The symposium also addressed the issue of unifying smaller groups in an effort to make a greater impact on campus. Josh Lanton, an RC senior and Mentality member, said one of his goals is to connect with other activist groups.

PAUL TALANIAN/Daily Members of seven campus activist groups gathered last night to discuss issues related to campus activism. Participants debated the role of militancy, education and apathy in the future of campus activism.

"We all need to work together as students to push apathy out," Lanton said.

Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action By Any Means Necessary member Jessica Curtin agreed with Lanton. "If we're going to change society, we have to unite," Curtin said.

Undergraduate Women's Studies Association member Lara Zador, an LSA sophomore, said apathy is connected to the militant image of many activist groups.

"I think apathy is directly proportional to the radical stigma associated with the group," Zador said.

Different methods for change also were discussed at the meeting. Whether a group should educate others or simply remain active was at the center of this debate.

Environmental Justice member Amanda Edmonds, an SNRE sophomore, said the groups have considered different options for raising awareness.

"We always discuss whether to have protests outside (University President Lee) Bollinger's office, or to set up a meeting with him," Edmonds said.

But some panel members believe the two can coexist.

"I don't think education and action are counter-posed," Curtain said.

The forum also included a discussion of the scope of issues activists should pursue. While some people advocated an all-out assault on society as a whole, others, such as Environmental Action Commitee member Joel Hoffman, said organizations must be realistic in their pursuits.

"What can we really do at the University of Michigan?" Hoffman asked. "What's possible? Is that petition you worked on for three months going to do jack shit?"

Gies said he is one of the many University students that avoids groups trying to address larger issues.

11-21-97