Troublesome timing

Policy protects students' observances

Last night, Jews across the globe began celebrating Rosh Hashanah, the Jewish New Year, which continues through tomorrow. Next Friday marks the beginning of the feast of Yom Kippur, the Day of Atonement - the most important Jewish holy day. Thanks to the University's policy on religious-academic conflicts, Jewish students who wish to observe the holidays need not worry that they will have to sacrifice their academic goals. Similarly, students of all faiths should know that their religious practices and observances are protected by the policy of religious-academic conflicts. As students prepare for midterms and face increasingly heavy workloads as the semester progresses, faculty must adhere to the terms outlined in the policy to allow students the freedom to practice their faiths without fear of academic punishment.

In an e-mail message sent to all students this week, the Office of the Registrar explained the University's standing on religious-academic conflicts. The policy, adopted in July 1996, states that if students provide reasonable notice for their absence, they may arrange for alternative opportunities to complete coursework missed due to religious observances. The policy also states that if they encounter any difficulty, students can appeal to the department chair; if this fails to solve the problem they should take their case to either the dean of the school or the University Ombuds.

This policy is extremely helpful to many University students for several reasons. First, it allows students to practice their religion without worrying that it will adversely affect their academic career. The policy acknowledges the importance of religion in people's lives, and it lets students of all faiths avoid having to choose between their beliefs and their studies. Second, having an official policy on religious-academic conflicts gives students a plan to fall back on if professors are unwilling to compromise, as well as a procedure to file complaints. And third, an official policy creates a need for faculty to address the conflict and arrange for alternatives; traditionally, some faculty ignored the importance of religious holidays by scheduling quizzes or tests with no alternative make-up dates, forcing students to forgo religion for academics.

Though the University's policy fills a need, it also consistently creates the conflicts in the first place. Last year, the winter term final exam period coincided with the beginning of Passover, a time when most observing students want go home to celebrate with their families. This is just one example of several instances in which major religious holidays came into conflict with University scheduling. Even with the existence of the religious-academic conflicts policy, the situation is not always easy for students. The University should take care in the future to avoid major conflicts.

Above all, it is important that students and the faculty are aware of the religious-academic conflicts policy. Students received information over e-mail last week, but because not all students use e-mail, it would have been helpful to pursue other methods. The University especially needs to remind the faculty. To ensure that the policy is truly effective, both students and faculty need to be aware of how it works, so that students may pursue both spiritual and academic goals without feeling pressured because the two conflict.

10-02-97

Next Article

HOME| NEWS| EDITORIAL| ARTS| SPORTS| ARCHIVES|


©1997 The Michigan Daily
Letters to the editor
should be sent to:
daily.letters@umich.edu
Comments about this site
should be sent to:
online.daily@umich.edu