Bollinger arranged his address into a number of broad and abstract principles. He peppered his remarks with literary references, and called the University "a living culture revelling in exploration of complexity," and "an epicenter of idealism." While his speech lacked certain definitive qualities, Bollinger did set forth a few meaningful goals.
He called for a transparent administration that will "make things happen without people knowing it's happening." A large bureaucracy is inherent to an institution as large as the University, but certain efforts can be made to cut red tape. But a speech alone cannot meet this goal - within a short period of time, Bollinger should present a specific plan to streamline the administration.
Bollinger also reaffirmed his support for affirmative action. He said a public institution has the obligation to reach out to as many segments of the population as possible - whether they vary by ethnic, racial, socioeconomic or geographic distinctions. His policies must further the University's longstanding commitment to diversity.
Most important, Bollinger said the University, along with other public institutions, should not be subject to political interference. In Lansing, Gov. John Engler and his legislative colleagues have continually breached the University Board of Regents' legal autonomy. In the past, the legislature used the threat of withholding state funding to butt its head into University affairs - several glaring examples are forcing the University to adhere to a certain in-state to out-of-state student ratio, and trying to withhold funding for benefits to University employees' same-sex partners. The regents, elected by a statewide majority, are most qualified to handle these kinds of issues. While it is important for Bollinger to maintain good relations with the capitol, he must remain firm on this front - making every effort to put this non-interference policy into state and national law.
In spite of these few promising statements, Bollinger never indicated how he would leave his permanent mark on the University. He should consider taking a cue from his predecessor.
Within the first six months of his presidency, James Duderstadt created the Michigan Mandate - which successfully increased the University's minority population. Duderstadt furthered his aim of increasing campus diversity through the Michigan Agenda for Women - a drive to increase the number of women in faculty and administrative positions, and to increase female students' campus opportunities. He also kicked off a fundraising initiative that put the University's endowment on par with those at the nation's top private colleges. Duderstadt's actions were not all commendable - nevertheless, he quickly established objectives, and worked ceaselessly to accomplish them.
The University lies at a crossroads - and Bollinger has the opportunity to forge its path ahead. He first needs to determine where he wants it to be heading. The University must not be left to muddle along without any apparent goals - it is an institution with limitless potential, and Bollinger must quickly seize the opportunity to shape its future development.