Dreamworks' 'Prince of Egypt' balances religious themes, children's animation

HOLLYWOOD - Steven Spielberg, Jeffrey Katzenberg and David Geffen have got guts.

When they formed DreamWorks SKG in 1994, it was the first new movie studio created in Hollywood in more than 50 years. Now, they're trying for another audacious first: a cartoon for adults.

DreamWorks' first animated feature film, due in theaters Dec. 18, will have "no princess, no singing teapots, no singing animals and no checking with marketing to see if they could sell it," said Walter Parkes, the studio's production chief.

The biblical tale of the life of Moses, titled "The Prince of Egypt," will have a line of collectible figures and books, but "no burning bush night lights, no Red Sea shower curtains that split in the middle, no 40-days-in-the-desert water bottles" or other merchandise tie-ins, said Sandra Rabins, one of the film's producers.

And if DreamWorks gets its wish, the epic project known around Hollywood by the nickname "P.O.E." will be rated not a kid-friendly G, but PG, carrying this warning: "Some material may not be suitable for children."

Guts? The DreamWorks folks have certainly got them. But their deliberate departure from formulas that have ensured the success of earlier animated musicals has prompted some to ask: Have they lost their minds?

Many movie industry insiders, who are watching the project with a mixture of skepticism and awe, agree that "The Prince of Egypt" has one key thing going for it: Katzenberg. The former chairman of Walt Disney Studios, whose shepherding of "Beauty and the Beast" and other Disney animated films was widely seen as brilliant, considers this project his baby. And that alone discourages people from predicting its failure.

"One thing you can bank on is Jeffrey is a good movie-maker," said one executive who asked not to be named.

But to succeed, DreamWorks must do something daunting: Change the moviegoing habits of American adults, many of whom see animation as kids' stuff. Perhaps even more challenging, given this movie's religious plot line, DreamWorks must convince grown-ups that animation can be serious without being preachy.

"The danger is if they treat it as too self-important," said another industry observer, who believed that the fledgling studio made that mistake with "Amistad," Spielberg's 1997 drama about slavery. "They misstepped drastically when they put it in the 'important' category and 'good medicine' category. ... (This time) if they come off as the religious zealot poster child, that's going to keep a lot of people away."

Already, eight months before its premiere, DreamWorks has begun maneuvering to position the film, whose budget has been reported in the $60 million-$70 million range.

Last month at ShoWest, the annual convention of theater owners in Las Vegas, the studio unveiled a promotional reel that portrayed "The Prince of Egypt" as the ultimate action-adventure story.

"It isn't your father's animated movie," Terry Press, the executive who heads up DreamWorks' strategic marketing, boasts as she points out a huge swarm of computer-generated locusts (7 million of them), the parting of the Red Sea (a complex, four-minute scene that took 12 people three years to create) and the spooky rendering of the death of the first born. But she admits that the movie presents a marketing challenge.

"I'm the first person to say the movie's a huge risk. People think of animated movies as things that come with Happy Meals," she said. "Jeffrey's theory is that animation is a tool to tell stories. That doesn't mean you just have to tell fairy tales. But I'm not kidding myself. ... Getting people there will be hard."

DreamWorks is gambling by omitting another time-tested ingredient: humor. Disney has successfully used humor to accomplish what might be called bilevel storytelling - the genie in "Aladdin," for example, who amuses the kiddies with slapstick antics while also delivering sarcastic, suggestive zingers that entertain adults.

The makers of "The Prince of Egypt" appear to be going for a more singular, sophisticated vision - in part because the tale they are telling doesn't easily lend itself to jokes.

"There's not as much humor as you're used to" in animation, Finkelman Cox said. "We tried. We had cute sheep. We wanted Ramses to have cats. We had it all. ... But we found we couldn't impose humor on this story. We couldn't put in talking gargoyles. It could be offensive."

According to his associates, Katzenberg is not merely hoping for a PG rating. He has said that if he doesn't get one - if, by chance, the Motion Picture Association of America rates the film a G - he will appeal.

"This is not a movie that parents can drop their kids off at for the afternoon. Parents need to be prepared to answer tough questions,"

Rabins, the producer, said soberly. "Is God an angry God? Why does he allow slavery? Why does he kill? This is not a movie for toddlers."

04-10-98