![]()

Exactly what constitutes classical literature can lead to much debate. The writings of minority authors such as Ralph Ellison, Maya Angelou or Toni Morrison have not yet stood the test of time and have yet to be completely woven into the cultural fabric of Western society. But the academic setting should serve as a testing ground for works of literature - schools hold the responsibility to widen the spectrum of what can be considered a "classic." Minority authors have not yet been given the chance to establish themselves as writers of classic literature, but that does not decease their importance or mar their genius. It is important for high school students to at least taste the diversity now offered by writers and appreciate the colorful stories of many cultures.
The reading curriculum's expansion can only aid in improving the quality of education given to the sometimes disillusioned students. Learning that members of one's ethnic background have succeeded in the literary world could lead to a greater sense of pride among students. Students also could gain a role model in a world often lacking true heroes. Critics of this curriculum expansion must not feel threatened, for classics will always be classics, and there is no harm done when students of different cultures celebrate their heritage.
Schools should keep in mind when forming their curricula to include both minority authors and works of more traditional classical literature. Changes to a curriculum, such as the one instituted in Detroit, must be careful not to go too far. It is important to remember, appreciate and continue to study literary classics in every high school nationwide. But equally important is the effort to expand what is considered a classic. The test of time for minority authors needs to begin now - the Detroit area high schools are taking the right steps.